CCS CCA Rules 1965 MCQs PDF | Quiz | Mock Test Q&A | Postal LDCE IPO Exam Paper III -Test 3
CCS CCA Rules 1965 MCQs PDF | Quiz | Mock Test Q&A | Postal LDCE IPO Exam Paper III
CCS CCA Rules 1965 MCQs PDF | Quiz | Mock Test Q&A | Postal LDCE IPO Exam Paper III: Hello guys, today I am back with another most important and interesting mock test Central Govt. Service (Classification Control and Appeal) Rule 1965 and PDF download copy on CCS CCA Rules 1965 MCQs. If you search in Google then you find a few websites that provide you paper-wise and chapter-wise mock tests and Multiple choice questions on CCS CCA Rule 1965 regularly. Don't worry. I am presenting you all the MCQs on CCS CCA Rule 1965 with a PDF download. Is it not great? This Quiz will be very interesting. This mock test will help you to improve your preparation for the upcoming LDCE IPO Exam.
This topic, CCS CCA Rule 1965, is in the syllabus of the LDCE IPO Exam on Paper III. You can get 7 -12 questions on this topic on the final exam. So, let's try the questions fast.
Important Things to Know about CCS CCA Rule MCQs Test 3
- There will be 25 Questions.
- Each Question has 4 options.
- Each Question carries 1 mark.
- Time will be 10 minutes.
- You will get an instant result after Submitting the mock test.
- Find the explanations of the Q&A below of the test.
- You can download CCS CCA Rule 1965 MCQs as a PDF copy at the end of the Mock Test.
MCQ Quiz on CCS CCA Rule 1965 - Test 3
Explanation of Answers
Explanation: Under the CCS (CCA) Rules, misconduct includes failure to comply with government orders, absence from duty without prior permission, and disobedience of lawful orders. All these actions can be classified as misconduct.
Explanation: Rule 19 allows for dismissal without inquiry in cases where the government servant has been convicted of a criminal offence or for reasons of national security.
Explanation: Minor penalties can be imposed without a formal inquiry, as outlined in Rule 16. However, major penalties require a detailed inquiry.
Explanation: Rule 10(6) specifies that the maximum period for which a suspension order can remain in effect without being reviewed is 90 days.
Explanation: Promotion is not considered a penalty under CCS Rules. Penalties include censure, compulsory retirement, and removal from service.
Explanation: Rule 19 allows for dismissal without a formal inquiry in specific situations, such as in cases involving criminal convictions.
Explanation: Minor penalties do not require a detailed inquiry, unlike major penalties which are governed by Rule 14.
Explanation: The maximum period for suspension without review is 90 days, as per Rule 10(6).
Explanation: If a government servant fails to comply with a disciplinary order, further inquiry may be needed to address the non-compliance.
Explanation: Government servants typically have 45 to 60 days to file an appeal against a penalty. The standard period for appeal is generally 45 days, but 60 days is often used in practice.
Explanation: Rule 14 covers the procedures for disciplinary actions, including penalties for failure to report crimes.
Explanation: Rule 10(6) specifies that a government servant can be suspended for a maximum of 90 days without formal charges being framed.
Explanation: If a penalty is not imposed immediately, the case should be reviewed periodically to determine if further action is required.
Explanation: Rule 14 governs the procedures for holding an inquiry and provides the framework for challenging its findings.
Explanation: Rule 29 allows a government servant to request a review or revision of an imposed penalty.
Explanation: Rule 22 specifies the time frame for filing appeals against penalties, typically within 45 days.
Explanation: The primary objective of a departmental inquiry is to establish whether a government servant has committed misconduct, as outlined in Rule 14.
Explanation: Rule 29 provides for the review of orders passed by the disciplinary authority.
Explanation: Rule 10(6) states that the Head of Department is responsible for reviewing suspension orders.
Explanation: The penalty is considered invalid if the government servant is not given a fair opportunity to present their case.
Explanation: Rule 14 addresses the procedure for conducting inquiries into serious offences.
Explanation: Rule 10 provides the procedure for dealing with unjustified suspensions, including reinstatement and compensation.
Explanation: Suspension pending investigation is the appropriate action for allegations of corruption, allowing for a thorough investigation.
Explanation: Rule 22 outlines the procedure for filing appeals against penalties, including those involving financial loss.
Explanation: The Appellate Authority reviews and decides on appeals against disciplinary actions, as outlined in Rule 22.
আজকের আইটির নীতিমালা মেনে কমেন্ট করুন। প্রতিটি কমেন্ট রিভিউ করা হয়।
comment url